Skip to content
Unmarked laboratory glassware and a notebook on a research desk.

Personal Care and Cosmetic Products as a Potential Source of Environmental Contamination by Microplastics in a Densely Populated Asian City

A Macao study combined an ingredient-label survey, extraction of selected personal-care products, and a separate coastal-sediment investigation.

Updated 2026-10-22

A Macao study combined an ingredient-label survey, extraction of selected personal-care products, and a separate coastal-sediment investigation.

Source details

Saidu M. Bashir, Sam Kimiko, Chu-Wa Mak, James Kar-Hei Fang, David Gonçalves. Frontiers in Marine Science. 2021.

DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2021.683482

Findings

A Macao study combined an ingredient-label survey, extraction of selected personal-care products, and a separate coastal-sediment investigation.

Scroll horizontally for methods and limitations.

EndpointSource-reported resultLocator
Selected facial scrub B7,703 ± 709 particles/gPDF p. 5 Table 2; pp. 2-3 methods
Selected facial scrub B74 to 660 µmPDF p. 5 Table 2; p. 3 methods

Methods and scope

Small wet-product portions dispersed in alcohol/water, density separation, drying and binocular microscope enumeration. Three replicate extractions per product; selected fragments measured and weighed. Raman identification confirmed LDPE as major product polymer. Described negative/positive controls and recovery concern sediment workflow; no separate numerical product-workflow blank/recovery result located.

What this source can support

Supports selected-product Table 2 measurements, retaining a conflict with narrative. The ingredient-label inventory is not laboratory confirmation of every product.

Label-screen-selected microbead products, sampled historically; not all cosmetics or current market. Product A/C include other material; use product B Table 2 result with LDPE assignment. Table 2 means differ from nearby prose and product descriptions differ between methods/results. Product-specific blank validation unclear; sediment controls cannot be assumed to validate product extraction. No measured skin penetration, human dose, or clinical outcome.

Cosmetics and personal care

Reported values and source locations

Reported valueMeasurement basisConditions and size contextOriginal document location
7,703 ± 709 particles/gTable 2 mean ± SD; narrative reports a different point estimateProduct B, selected personal-care scrub; triplicate extractions
74-660 µm observed product-B range
PDF p. 5 Table 2; pp. 2-3 methods
74 to 660 µmObserved size rangeProduct B microscopic maximum diameter measurements
Observed range, not validated lower detection floor
PDF p. 5 Table 2; p. 3 methods
Source provenance

Primary PDF SHA-256: ee700e8b74e01c55710b25e23522235f6c769b3e20ecb601083e7a1df2ee07a9

The source record identifies the scope and limits of the primary-document review. Follow the DOI or official source link for the original document; this site does not redistribute the PDF.

Cite this page

Microplastics Reference Library. Personal Care and Cosmetic Products as a Potential Source of Environmental Contamination by Microplastics in a Densely Populated Asian City. Updated 2026-10-22. https://microplasticsindex.com/sources/s-ee700e8b74e0

Search the library