Skip to content
Unmarked laboratory glassware and a notebook on a research desk.

First Report on Occurrence and Characterization of Microplastics in Feces of Larus armenicus (Buturlin, 1934) in the Lake Van Basin (Eastern Anatolia, Türkiye)

A noninvasive survey reported suspected particles in composite Armenian gull fecal samples, with FTIR support for selected larger particles.

Updated 2026-10-22

A noninvasive survey reported suspected particles in composite Armenian gull fecal samples, with FTIR support for selected larger particles.

Source details

Erkan Azizoğlu. Toxics. 2026.

DOI: 10.3390/toxics14030202

Findings

A noninvasive survey reported suspected particles in composite Armenian gull fecal samples, with FTIR support for selected larger particles.

  • 480 fecal deposits; Selected from Armenian gull feces collected in the Lake Van Basin; pooled before analysis.
  • 8,197 visually classified suspected particles; Composite gull feces; no quantitative field or procedural blanks.
  • approximately 20% of particles selected for FTIR; Selection of larger particles; Methods describes fibers longer than 300 µm.
  • 100-300 µm visual size class; Most frequent visual size category of all suspected fecal particles.

Methods and scope

Fecal deposits were pooled into composite groups, digested with KOH and peroxide, filtered and visually classified. Selected larger particles underwent FTIR; SEM-EDX assessed surface and elemental characteristics. Quantitative field and procedural blanks were not performed.

What this source can support

Evidence that selected fecal particles were polymers; supports a narrow local environmental occurrence page.

Not individual-bird prevalence or body burden. Most visual particles were not chemically confirmed. No quantitative blanks means airborne contamination cannot be ruled out. Abstract and Methods differ in description of which larger particles were selected. EDX alone cannot establish polymer identity.

Environmental wildlife

Reported values and source locations

Reported valueMeasurement basisConditions and size contextOriginal document location
480 fecal depositssample count, not known independent birdsSelected from Armenian gull feces collected in the Lake Van Basin; pooled before analysis
Visually classified particles below 5000 µm; subset >300 µm FTIR tested
PDF p. 5 §2.3; p. 7 Table 1
8,197 visually classified suspected particlestotal visual suspects, not all spectroscopically confirmedComposite gull feces; no quantitative field or procedural blanks
Visual size categories include <100 µm through >1000 µm; total defined <5000 µm
PDF pp. 6-7 §3.1 and Table 1
approximately 20% of particles selected for FTIRapproximate selected subsetSelection of larger particles; Methods describes fibers longer than 300 µm
selected particles >300 µm; no chemical confirmation of smaller fractions
PDF p. 6 §2.5
100-300 µm visual size classmodal visual size binMost frequent visual size category of all suspected fecal particles
100-300 µm, below stated FTIR selection threshold
PDF p. 7 §3.2 and Table 2
Source provenance

Primary PDF SHA-256: bc68ef9e4ee3b62489355a71d11a3faeaa549454b9cbb69d70de03fde4de4cf2

The source record identifies the scope and limits of the primary-document review. Follow the DOI or official source link for the original document; this site does not redistribute the PDF.

Cite this page

Microplastics Reference Library. First Report on Occurrence and Characterization of Microplastics in Feces of Larus armenicus (Buturlin, 1934) in the Lake Van Basin (Eastern Anatolia, Türkiye). Updated 2026-10-22. https://microplasticsindex.com/sources/s-bc68ef9e4ee3

Search the library