Skip to content
Unmarked laboratory glassware and a notebook on a research desk.

Drinking plastics? Quantification and qualification of microplastics in drinking water distribution systems by µFTIR and Py-GCMS

An investigation of a Swedish drinking-water distribution system combined µFTIR particle analysis with pyrolysis-GC/MS polymer-mass analysis.

Updated 2026-10-22

An investigation of a Swedish drinking-water distribution system combined µFTIR particle analysis with pyrolysis-GC/MS polymer-mass analysis.

Source details

Inga V. Kirstein, Fides Hensel, Alessio Gomiero, Lucian Iordachescu, Alvise Vianello, Hans B. Wittgren, Jes Vollertsen. Water Research. 2021.

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116519

Findings

An investigation of a Swedish drinking-water distribution system combined µFTIR particle analysis with pyrolysis-GC/MS polymer-mass analysis.

Scroll horizontally for methods and limitations.

EndpointSource-reported resultLocator
Drinking water distribution samples174 ± 405 MPs/m³PDF p. 6 §3.2; PDF p. 3 sampling and p. 4 §2.6
Extracted drinking-water particles6.6 µm nominal minimumPDF p. 4 §2.6
Detected drinking-water particles8 to 374 µmPDF p. 8 §3.4 and Figure 4

Methods and scope

Triplicate samples at five stations, with 200-1100 L filtered through 5 µm steel filters. Filter cleaning, extraction, optional density separation, sample splitting, µFTIR imaging and automated classification plus Py-GCMS. Nominal µFTIR floor 6.6 µm after minimum-pixel rule. Five station blanks averaged 46 ± 63 MPs/blank. Polymer-specific blank values subtracted, negative count differences set to zero; size analysis used uncorrected detections. µFTIR mass estimated from shape/density; Py-GCMS independently measured polymer mass.

What this source can support

Supports blank-corrected source-specific counts and separately characterized dimensions. Demonstrates why spectroscopic count and thermal polymer mass are distinct measurements.

Single system/campaign; relatively sparse detections and variable blanks. Aliquots, not every particle, shared across methods. Zero after subtraction is not proof of absence. Size distributions use uncorrected detections. Model-derived particle mass is not directly measured mass. Primary volume year is 2021 despite 2020 filename/DOI/online date. No clinical outcomes or category-wide safety threshold.

Tap water

Reported values and source locations

Reported valueMeasurement basisConditions and size contextOriginal document location
174 ± 405 MPs/m³Mean ± SD across sampled distribution systemSwedish waterworks and connected distribution stations; source-specific polymer blank subtraction
Nominal µFTIR minimum 6.6 µm; observed major dimensions 8-374 µm
PDF p. 6 §3.2; PDF p. 3 sampling and p. 4 §2.6
6.6 µm nominal minimumAnalytical nominal sizeµFTIR minimum-pixel rule applied to automated identification
Nominal size threshold, not a validated complete recovery floor
PDF p. 4 §2.6
8 to 374 µmObserved range, not blank-corrected size distributionUncorrected detections used for dimension analysis
Major dimension
PDF p. 8 §3.4 and Figure 4
Source provenance

Primary PDF SHA-256: 41d8667b76f0ce12b3a80e5e2c422806a0b75ee98cc52075f2ea396c81aeae1f

The source record identifies the scope and limits of the primary-document review. Follow the DOI or official source link for the original document; this site does not redistribute the PDF.

Cite this page

Microplastics Reference Library. Drinking plastics? Quantification and qualification of microplastics in drinking water distribution systems by µFTIR and Py-GCMS. Updated 2026-10-22. https://microplasticsindex.com/sources/s-41d8667b76f0

Search the library