Skip to content
Unmarked laboratory glassware and a notebook on a research desk.

Identification and Evaluation of Microplastics from Tea Filter Bags Based on Raman Imaging

Raman imaging of particles released from nonwoven PET, nonwoven PP, and woven nylon filter bags and their strings.

Updated 2026-10-22

Raman imaging of particles released from nonwoven PET, nonwoven PP, and woven nylon filter bags and their strings.

Source details

Tingna Mei, Jiahua Wang, Xiaofeng Xiao, Jingwen Lv, Qiaocong Li, Huang Dai, Xiaodan Liu, Fuwei Pi. Foods. 2022.

DOI: 10.3390/foods11182871

Findings

Chemical imaging identified PET, PP, nylon, and PE in soaking samples. Multichannel spectral fitting found additional particles missed by a single-peak imaging approach. Surface-attached fragments and string material contributed to the observed findings.

Scroll horizontally for methods and measurement limits.

Reported resultConditionsSize contextOriginal locator
34 of 36 soaking samples contained Raman-identified polymersNonwoven PET, nonwoven PP, woven nylon bags in 30 mL ultrapure water; 70, 80, 90 °C; 1, 5, 10, 30 min; selected Raman regionsRaman mapping regions; 3 µm scanning step; no complete validated lower-size count boundaryPDF p. 9 §3.4 and p. 10 Table 1; p. 2 §2.1

Methods and scope

Separate method-optimization and detection experiments. The detection experiment soaked individual filter bags in ultrapure water over stated temperatures and times; glass microfiber filtration and selected-region Raman imaging followed. Direct classical least squares used reference spectra to distinguish overlapping polymer signals. Cleaned samplers, covered glass dishes, and powder-free gloves were reported. A numerical full-procedure blank series is not reported in the main article.

What this source can support

Direct evidence of chemically identified polymer release and method-dependent detection, without extrapolating observed-region counts to all consumer bags.

Selected regions were imaged; not a complete filter census. Main-text count examples belong to imaging comparisons, not particles per retail cup. Some detected material can come from strings and particles already attached to bag surfaces. No standardized lower-size quantitation validation or human-health endpoint. PDF text layer contains extensive duplicated text; cited pages were visually checked.

Tea bags

Reported values and source locations

Reported valueMeasurement basisConditions and size contextOriginal document location
34 of 36 soaking samples contained Raman-identified polymersDetection frequency across study conditions, not product-market prevalenceNonwoven PET, nonwoven PP, woven nylon bags in 30 mL ultrapure water; 70, 80, 90 °C; 1, 5, 10, 30 min; selected Raman regions
Raman mapping regions; 3 µm scanning step; no complete validated lower-size count boundary
PDF p. 9 §3.4 and p. 10 Table 1; p. 2 §2.1
Source provenance

Primary PDF SHA-256: 344cfd824c7ee6c0cc5f35b6b33c66dae98b6a6be81750b3d207b73c4ea90954

The source record identifies the scope and limits of the primary-document review. Follow the DOI or official source link for the original document; this site does not redistribute the PDF.

Cite this page

Microplastics Reference Library. Identification and Evaluation of Microplastics from Tea Filter Bags Based on Raman Imaging. Updated 2026-10-22. https://microplasticsindex.com/sources/s-344cfd824c7e

Search the library